Great-pyramid-introduction

Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

ARCHITECTONICS

From Cosmic Theories to Urban Development

Dr. Hossam Aboulfotouh

(||)||||||(||)

||||||||||

(]||||||||||[)

THE HORIZON THEORY, PART-II: Internal Design Concept of the Great Pyramid.

Hossam Aboulfotouh, Ph.D

Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts, Minia University, and Director UIA-WPAHR-V fotouh@mail.com

[Proceedings of the German-Egyptian Conference on Conservation and Restoration, Faculty of Fine Arts, Minia University, 17-18 March 2005]

Giza Pyramids plateau, or the horizon of "Hor-Mageed-Don, " the horizon of the falcon of the Mighty-God, and its three pyramids, is the most amazing architectonic museum on Earth. Understanding the coded sciences in its architectonic masterpieces, particularly the great pyramid, were, and still are, among the top most challenging topics of scientific researches. Scholars are still searching for the holy wisdom and the great knowledge of the ancient designer of the pyramids. However, until today, many of the scientific research questions concerning the pyramids design philosophy still unanswered. Such condition that made pyramids vulnerable to such excavations that aims merely at finding the treasures of the ancient Egyptian kings and that might still unfound and located some where in secret rooms inside the pyramids. Some scholars and intellectuals too believe that those unfound treasures might include the papyri that describe the design philosophy of the pyramids and the holy knowledge of their brilliant designer. Until today, excavations inside the great pyramid, even with using modern technologies, have led to nothing but further mystifying the road towards understanding the signs of primordial wisdom inherent in the perfect architectonic masterpieces of the Earth.

This paper, is the second part of the pyramids design theory that titled " The Horizon Theory." This part includes the translation of one of the architectonic files encoded in the design of Giza Pyramids. As mentioned in part-I, these files represent the encyclopedia of basic sciences of the ancient Egyptians that was recorded geometrically in the design of Giza Pyramids and their site plan. These architectonic masterpieces and their horizon represent the hard disk that includes the holy ideology and the sacred sciences of the ancient Egyptian architectonicians. This file describes the design philosophy of the pyramidal form as well as the astronomical cross-sectional diagram of the observed Sun's motion around the Earth that upon which the entrance-passage and shafts of the great pyramid are located, positioned, and tilted. It shows as well why some shafts are opened to the exterior and others are ended in specific positions inside the Great pyramid.

Section-1: Introduction

Section-2: The astronomical Coordinate System of the ancient Egyptians

Section-3: The pyramidal form and the spherical system of coordinates

Section-4: Great pyramid's shafts and entry passage, and its spherical domain

Section-1: Introduction

Why the ancient Egyptian designer used the pyramidal form , and from where he got this idea? Some historians and scientists have tried to answer this question; however, their replies were based on that they are biased to believe that the pyramid designer was only a skilled mason, who duplicates only what he sees and cannot create remarkable architectonic designs. Edwards1 has postulated that the designer had imitated the shape of the sunrays when they penetrate the clouds at noontime, during the day of summer solstice. Lately, El-Baz 2 has suggested that the designer had duplicated the shape of such hills located in the western Sahara. On the contrary, an architect would say that creating the form of perfect architectonic masterpieces like the pyramids should be based on such scientific idea, particularly if we take into our consideration the geometric accuracy of their dimensions and perfect mathematical ratios. The pyramids section in the encyclopedia Americana includes some of the mathematical and abnormal merits that scientists where able to observe in the great pyramid; one of them is the inclusion of the ratio p (pi)=3.14 between the perimeter of the pyramid's base (920.48m) and its height (146.5m.) Add to this the lately discovered hidden power of the pyramidal form that prevents the fast rotting of foods, accelerates the growth of plants, empowers the vital system of the human body, and keeps the razor blades sharp3. Moreover, the fall of the experiments that have been done in late sixtieth to discover any hidden rooms inside the second pyramid, using then the latest discovered technology of photos by cosmic-rays4, to come up with any valid results implies that pyramid's power is an unusual phenomenon. All of these facts hint to that the scientific community should not neglect the other alternative of that the pyramids designer was likely having excellent scientific knowledge. Such positive change in the methodology towards discovering the great knowledge behind designing and erecting those marvelous architectonic masterpieces might guide the future excavations inside and outside Giza pyramids.

As it have been discussed in Part-I of the Horizon theory5, the site plan of the Horizon of Giza pyramids shows that the three pyramids and Sphinx are among the architectonic elements of one astronomical plan. All of them are coherent parts of one architectonic project. The exact locations of these four elements were chosen carefully by the designer, indicating his strong scientific knowledge in spherical astronomy, as seen in Figure-1. In part-I, the author has double-checked the accuracy of his hypotheses and his astro-mathematical equations for identifying the design locations of the three pyramids, using the results of the site-survey that was undertaken bPetrie6 in 1883. Besides, it has been mentioned in part-I that the designer had coded his astronomical knowledge in his architectonic design in order to save them for the coming generations, knowing that the Earth will inter into one of its frequent cycles of supper major disasters. This may imply too that using the pyramidal form was not a random decision, or by imitating any form, which does not have perfect architectonic meaning.

Click on picture to see high resolution

Figure-1: The right sketch shows the site plan of the horizon of the three pyramids in Giza plateau. The left sketch shows a perspective of the three basic astronomical information of the horizon: the meridian angle on the vernal equinox, the meridian angle on the summer solstice and the sunrise angle on the summer solstice

In other study7, the author has discussed in details the origin of any perfect geometrical form. That study supports the Horizon theory and formulates the scientific base for observing the hidden cosmic meaning of the pyramidal form. It proves theoretically that the cosmic law of numbers is the key to observe the geometric forms that represent perfect numbers. Besides, it identifies the correlation between these forms and the physical structures of the cosmic systems they represent, e.g., atom, solar system, galaxy, etc. Beyond the mathematical formulas and the architectonic hypotheses of that study, one could summaries its first part on the law of numbers in the coming paragraphs.

We may imagine that the sum of, the end or, meeting points of any geometrical shape in the two-dimensional plane represents a number, starting from just a point. Accordingly, a point indicates one, the line indicates two, a triangle is three, a square is four, a pentagon is five and so on, until the concentric shape becomes a perfect circle indicating the numbers from 360 until infinity. Any meeting or end-point in these geometric figures in the two-dimensional plane may be observed as it represents such orbiter (an electron or a planet) rotating around a central body located in the central point of the concentric shape. The simple conclusion of this is that the basic geometric shapes in the two dimensional plane represent basic cosmic systems (Bs), like for example a Hydrogen atom that has only one electron and one proton, i.e.; it thus represents number one. The study assumes theoretically that, at the atomic level, any basic system contains only electrons and protons; thus, a Hydrogen atom is the only discovered basic system; all the other known atoms in the periodic table are classified in that study as complex systems.

Further, basic systems may join-together and construct a new complex system (Cs). An example, if we glued together the edges of four triangular shapes of equal sides, one's side with the other's side, they construct a pyramid. However, theoretically, the process for constricting a pyramidal physical system in the cosmos is not as simple as the mentioned example.

As shown in figure-2, a pyramidal physical system of the four sides is constructed by 41 basic systems: one of basic system 4 (), four of basic system 3 (D ), twelve of basic system 2 (¾ ), and twenty-four of basic system one (· ). That pyramidal system represents the perfect number 28 that could be generated by multiplying the numbers "1, 2, 3, and 4" that constructed the system and adding to the result the largest number (4) that represents the base of the system. Hypothetically, in atoms, the number of their systems is the number of their neutrons; the complex system 28, or we may call it the Cs₂₄₊₄, represents the chromium atom. Figure-2 shows that the center of the basic system 4 (Bs4) is the center of the pyramidal form.

Click on picture to see high resolution

Figure-2: The initial pyramidal form of Cs₂₄₊₄ during the assembling moment. The basic systems (Bs1, Bs2, Bs3, and Bs4) are not represented in equal dimensions.

That architectonic study postulates that the structure of our solar system could be represented by the pyramidal system Cs₂₄₊₄, like the chromium atom. Accordingly, the author has established 39 tectonic mathematical equations for the structure of our solar system, including both the orbital and spin motions of its planets and natural satellites, as well as the law of music of its spheres. Thereupon, it has become obvious that the stories about the relation between the pyramids and the cosmic law of numbers that were said by many historians, particularly El-Maqrizie8 and Al-Masoudy9, are not myths nor are they fictions.

The above mentioned architectonic study7 of the author proves, and was supported by, the astronomical postulations in the great work of Plato that titled Timaeus10 and that was based on the Pythagorean philosophy, on both the law of numbers and the law of the music of the spheres. Plato discussed in that book the evolution and the structure of our solar system, which was then representing to him the whole universe. However, the link between the theories of these two brilliant philosophers and the pyramidal concept and how the geometry of a pyramid represents the structure of our solar system remained not understood. The hypothesis of these two great Hellenistic philosophers on the mathematical link between the cosmic structure and both the law of numbers and the law of music of the sphere, were observed for milleniums as a sort of scientific morality. In March 2004, the author has explained in that study what these philosophers meant, using the tectonic mathematical analysis.

In fact, both Pythagoras and Plato had studied in Egypt between the sixth and fourth century before Christianity and perhaps they then learned all the scared sciences of the ancient Egyptians. However, they did not hint to any relation between what they believed on numbers, music, and astronomy; and the pyramids of Egypt or the pyramidal form in general. That may imply three hypotheses. Either many of the sacred sciences of the pyramids design were lost by the time when these two philosopher were studding in Egypt. The second is that sacred sciences were the top secrets of the Egyptians and the foreign scholars were not allowed to know them in details, studding only the generality of it. The third is that they had studied all the details of the sacred sciences of the ancient Egyptians, followed their doctrine of keeping them secret, and spook only about their laws in the generality manner. No matter what was the true story, the author expresses his gratefulness to these two great and brilliant philosophers for saving such human knowledge, which represents what they have thought is worth teaching to their students and in order to be kept for the future generations.

Pythagoras thought to his students what he believed on the secrets of numbers, the music of the spheres, cosmic geometry, and astronomy without writing any book, as said by Olaf 11. Two hundred years after Pythagoras, Plato, on the contrary, have written his great work "Timaeus", describing all what he believed on these subjects. On the contrary, about two and half millenniums before the time of Pythagoras, Gupora the designer of Giza pyramids had chosen different tool for conserving the sacred sciences of the ancient Egyptians. He coded all his scientific knowledge in his architectonic designs of the pyramids, the first of them is using the pyramidal form that indicates the solar system and the perfect number 28, or as it was called then the "Be-n" System. It is worth mentioning he, because we human beings are the settlers of the Cs28, our sound system can only pronounce 28 different sounds that we call each a letter, that were the basis of the hieroglyphic system of writing.

Section-1: Introduction

Section-2: The astronomical Coordinate System of the ancient Egyptians

Section-3: The pyramidal form and the spherical system of coordinates

Section-4: Great pyramid's shafts and entry passage, and its spherical domain

References:

1- Edwards I. E. S, The Pyramids of Egypt, rev. ed., Pit-man, 1961.

2- Farouk- El-Baz, Gifts of the Desert, archaeology Magazine, Volume 54 Number 2, March/April 2001

3- Encyclopedia Americana, Vol. 23, Grolier Ltd., Canada, 1978

4- Fathy Al-Bedawy, Pyramid and Computer: the symbol of Ancient and Modern Civilization, Cairo, 1991.

5- Aboulfotouh, H.: The Horizon Theory, Part-I: Original Concept Plan of the Pyramids Plateau, Cairo, proceedings of the UIA-WPAR-V International Conference, Bibliotheca Alexandrina, 2002. Www.fotouh.netfirms.com/horizon-theory-introduction.htm

6- Petrie, W.M.F., The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, London, 1883.

7- Aboulfotouh, H.: Determining Planetary Spin and Musical Gravitation in the Spheres of Cosmic Systems of Perfect Numbers, Cairo, Dar Al-Kutub, 2004. www.fotouh.netfirms.com/spin-gravity-introduction.htm

8- Al-Maqrizi, Al Mawaes Wal A'atebar Bezeker Al-khetat Wal Asar (Sermons and Lessons with the Discourse on Alleys and Monuments), Vol.I, Dar Al-Tahrier, Bulaque Edition, Cairo, 1849.

9- Al-Masoudy, Mrog Al-Zahab Wa Ma'aten Al-Gawher (Golden Lava and Metals of Essence), Asria Library press, Saida, 1987.

10- Plato, Timaeus, (330 BC.).part1-paragraph-6 http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Plato/Timaeus

11- Olaf Pedersen, Early Physics and Astronomy, a Historical Introduction, Cambridge University press, New York, 1993.

12- A. Weigert & H. Zimmermann, Encyclopedia of Astronomy, Arabic edition, Abdelkawy Aiad translator, The Egyptian General Organization for Book, Cairo, 1990

13- R. Gantenbrink in R. Stadelmann, MDAIK 50 (1994), 285-294. http://www.cheops.org

| Home | Top |

(||)||||||(||)

||||||||||

(]||||||||||[)